This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Business News Legal Management & Funding Top Stories
Craig David manager backs three-strikes
By CMU Editorial | Published on Friday 25 September 2009
Ahead of last night’s big Featured Artists’ Coalition debate, a leading artist manager, Colin Lester of CLM Entertainment, made public the letter he’d sent to Peter Mandelson’s department – who are spearheading the latest P2P proposals of course – in which he says in no uncertain terms that now is the time for ministers to act, with strict rules and sanctions needed to stop the growth of online piracy.
Lester had already criticised the FAC’s original statement of the latest government proposals, telling the Daily Telegraph: “It is very easy to be charitable when you are rich. Most of these [FAC] artists don’t earn their money from the recorded music business. They earn from the live business. [But] illegal file-sharing is a complete destruction of some people’s livings”.
He was also took issue with the FAC’s claim that it didn’t want to see music fans “criminalised”, arguing that the current government proposals involving net suspension were not about criminalising fans at all, and that the artist body’s use of such words was deliberately emotive. Such was his disagreement with the FAC’s original statement, the artists he represents – most notably Craig David and Remi Nicole – resigned from the Coalition.
In his letter to Team Mandelson, he writes: “I and the artists I represent agree that this issue is the key challenge facing our industry and that the longer we dither about the rights and wrongs of taking punitive action against those who steal our livelihoods the worse the situation will get. Whilst the vast majority of those involved in music agree that illegal file-sharing is wrong there remains an ongoing debate as to how to tackle it”.
He continues: “The recent argument put forward by the Featured Artists’ Coalition that ‘the stick is now in danger of being way out of proportion to the carrot’ fails to recognise the fact that ‘carrot’ approach has failed miserably! There has also been a point of view advanced that illegal file-sharing is good for the marketing and promotion of music. There is some truth in that but the benefits of any positive promotion gained through illegal distribution are, in my opinion, far outweighed by the damage caused to the future income of the creators of and investors in that music. Let us not forget that artists and copyright owners still retain the right to give away their music if they choose to, but it should be remembered that is their right to give it away not the consumer’s right to steal it”.
He concludes: “The music consumer, as with any other citizen of this country, cannot simply choose which laws to obey and which to ignore. Without enforcement and punishment of those who break the law any legislation is pointless. We must advocate and support a zero tolerance policy against illegal file-sharing and to take a united stance against this issue before we don’t have an industry left to defend”.
I think its fair to say the management community is split on this issue, with many seeing both sides of the argument. While the Music Managers’ Forum didn’t formally back the Featured Artists Coalition’s original critical statement of the government’s proposals, some of its key members have been quietly supporting it. Others, like Lester, have no sympathy with music fans who continue to access music illegally. Whether the FAC’s attempts at a compromise last night will satisfy any differences of opinion in the management community I’m not sure.
